Zapowiedź
meczu
MATCH REPORT
USA - USL Championship - 09/06/20 21:56 - 20.Runda
2-0 [90‘]
2-0 [90‘]
Lasso
|
4‘ | |
(Johnson)
Guenzatti
[1-0]
|
6‘ | |
(Steinberger)
Ekra
[2-0]
|
39‘ | |
2-0 HT | ||
46‘ |
Patrick Kader Bohui
|
|
50‘ |
Aaronson
|
|
56‘ |
Ofeimu
|
|
Ekra
Murphy
|
58‘ | |
Louro
|
60‘ | |
Steinberger
Oduro
|
64‘ | |
Johnson
|
64‘ | |
67‘ |
Miscic
Rabadán
|
|
68‘ |
Picazo
Flores
|
|
71‘ |
Harriel
Kingue
|
|
Guenzatti
Varela Mendoza
|
80‘ | |
Fernandes
Lachowecki
|
80‘ | |
82‘ |
McGlynn
|
|
2-0 FT |
Statystyki
meczu
KARTKI 2 0
KARTKI 2 0
Kursy
Mecz | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Kursy początkowe | -588 | 500 | 1000 | ||
Kursy przed meczem |
-588 | 500 | 1000 |
Gole | ||
---|---|---|
Linia | Poniżej | Powyżej |
2.5 | 170 | -227 |
Składy
Status: Potwierdzony skład
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Status: Potwierdzony skład
Bethlehem Steel
Składy
Statystyki:
ŁAWKA
Tampa Bay Rowdies
-
Dobra forma w ostatnich 5 meczach u siebie dla Tampa Bay Rowdies
W ostatnich 5 meczach na Al Lang Stadium rekord formy to (3W, 2D, 0L), co jest nagrodą dla fanów Tampa Bay Rowdies ze średnią frekwencją 28.
-
Niepokonana seria (6) na stadionie domowym
Tampa Bay Rowdies są niepokonani w ostatnich 6 meczach u siebie w USL Championship (4W, 2D). Zawodnicy strzelili 12 bramek i stracili 5 w tej serii.
Bethlehem Steel
-
Druga absencja dla
Trener M. LeBlanc nadal jest bez kluczowego zawodnika (8 mecze, 2 gole, 2 asysty). Powód: niedostępne.
-
Pierwszy bramkarz Matthew Freese nie zagra
Drużyna jest bez pierwszego bramkarza Matthew Freese z 630 minutami rozegranymi. Powód: niedostępne.
-
Złe wyniki w ostatnich meczach dla Bethlehem Steel
Zła forma w ostatnich 5 meczach. Trudny okres dla zawodników i trenera M. LeBlanc, ponieważ rekord formy to (1W, 0D, 4L) przy średniej 3.2 straconych bramek na mecz.
Podsumowanie
H2H
H2H
(dom/wyjazd)
Forma
Forma
(dom/wyjazd)
Siła drużyny
Bezpośrednie starcia
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/21/19 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
6-1 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
06/22/19 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1-2 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
10/14/18 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1-0 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
1-0 | 6 - 13 | 6- 6 | 43 - 83 | 6 - 3 |
0 (45%) 0 (53%) |
- | - | - | |
03/24/18 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
2-0 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
0-0 | 17 - 6 | 11- 4 | 74 - 41 | 11 - 4 |
1 (49%) 5 (24%) |
-189 | 320 | 400 | |
09/30/17 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
1-1 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
3 (56%) 6 (35%) |
-137 | 275 | 275 | |
09/27/17 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
2-2 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
0-1 | 9 - | 5- | 82 - | 6 - |
2 (79%) 2 (50%) |
140 | 260 | 140 |
Forma drużyny
Tampa Bay Rowdies Last 6 Matches
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
3 - 0 |
Miami FC II
|
1-0 | 13 - 7 | 5 - 1 | 97 - 67 | 5 - 4 |
4 (65%) 3 (61%) |
-167 | 333 | 350 | |
29.8 |
Charleston Battery
|
1 - 0 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
1-0 | 12 - 7 | 4 - 1 | 57 - 75 | 0 - 1 |
2 (68%) 2 (73%) |
120 | 220 | 190 | |
22.8 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
2 - 1 |
Atlanta United II
|
2-0 | 13 - 5 | 5 - 2 | 75 - 32 | 3 - 2 |
4 (62%) 2 (74%) |
-345 | 333 | 750 | |
16.8 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
1 - 1 |
Miami FC II
|
0-1 | 12 - 4 | 5 - 2 | 74 - 46 | 9 - 1 |
4 (66%) 3 (59%) |
-175 | 300 | 333 | |
12.8 |
Atlanta United II
|
0 - 2 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
0-1 | 4 - 8 | 3 - 5 | 64 - 56 | 3 - 3 |
2 (73%) 1 (75%) |
320 | 300 | -154 | |
7.8 |
Miami FC II
|
0 - 3 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
0-1 | 5 - 5 | 1 - 4 | 56 - 57 | 9 - 5 |
4 (56%) 1 (77%) |
145 | 260 | 145 |
Bethlehem Steel Last 6 Matches
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1 - 2 |
Atlanta United II
|
0-1 | 9 - 11 | 3 - 3 | 50 - 79 | 4 - 8 |
4 (39%) 3 (63%) |
220 | 260 | 110 | |
5.8 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
3 - 2 |
New York RB II
|
2-2 | 12 - 18 | 7 - 7 | 42 - 86 | 5 - 9 |
4 (44%) 3 (47%) |
500 | 350 | -227 | |
1.8 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
4 - 0 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
3-0 | 7 - 5 | 5 - 2 | 107 - 59 | 7 - 3 |
4 (76%) 4 (48%) |
-909 | 800 | 1200 | |
25.7 |
Hartford Athletic
|
3 - 2 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
2-2 | 11 - 9 | 6 - 3 | 65 - 53 | 5 - 4 |
4 (64%) 3 (56%) |
-303 | 400 | 700 | |
22.7 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1 - 5 |
New York RB II
|
0-1 | 9 - 20 | 4 - 8 | 59 - 73 | 6 - 10 |
5 (48%) 4 (50%) |
250 | 260 | -120 | |
18.7 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
0 - 6 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
0-2 | 2 - 10 | 1 - 8 | 33 - 56 | 0 - 7 |
5 (8%) 1 (14%) |
550 | 333 | -227 |
Klasyfikacja
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Reno 1868 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 43:21 | 36 |
|
2.25 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 81% | 75% | 4.00 |
2. | Sacramento Republic | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 27:17 | 30 |
|
1.88 | 56% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 59% | 46% | 2.75 |
3. | Tacoma Defiance | 16 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 25:32 | 14 |
|
0.88 | 69% | 1.3 | 2.9 | 87% | 87% | 3.56 |
4. | Portland Timbers II | 16 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 20:50 | 9 |
|
1.13 | 69% | 1.6 | 4.3 | 94% | 94% | 4.38 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Phoenix Rising | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 46:17 | 35 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 0.2 | 0.3 | 87% | 67% | 3.94 |
2. | LA Galaxy II | 16 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 29:32 | 26 |
|
1.38 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 88% | 81% | 3.81 |
3. | Orange County | 16 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 18:18 | 24 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 1.9 | 4.9 | 63% | 44% | 2.25 |
4. | San Diego Loyal | 16 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 17:18 | 23 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 2.4 | 3.2 | 75% | 38% | 2.19 |
5. | Las Vegas Lights | 16 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 24:34 | 11 |
|
0.38 | 75% | 2.0 | 4.8 | 81% | 63% | 3.63 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
2. | New Mexico United | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 23:17 | 27 |
|
1.75 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 86% | 75% | 2.67 |
3. | Colorado Springs | 16 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 19:28 | 13 |
|
0.88 | 69% | 1.5 | 3.9 | 78% | 60% | 2.94 |
4. | Real Monarchs | 16 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 14:25 | 11 |
|
0.88 | 44% | 1.8 | 4.6 | 62% | 43% | 2.44 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | San Antonio | 16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 30:14 | 33 |
|
1.88 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.4 | 75% | 50% | 2.75 |
2. | Tulsa Roughnecks | 15 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 21:16 | 25 |
|
1.88 | 100% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 88% | 39% | 2.47 |
3. | Austin Bold | 16 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 30:27 | 22 |
|
1.25 | 75% | 2.4 | 5.3 | 88% | 63% | 3.56 |
4. | OKC Energy | 16 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12:29 | 10 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 2.6 | 4.7 | 81% | 50% | 2.56 |
5. | Rio Grande Valley | 14 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 17:28 | 9 |
|
0.88 | 71% | 1.4 | 4.4 | 79% | 57% | 3.21 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Louisville City | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 28:12 | 35 |
|
2.75 | 100% | 0.1 | 0.5 | 66% | 37% | 2.50 |
2. | Saint Louis FC | 16 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 22:21 | 25 |
|
1.50 | 56% | 0.2 | 0.3 | 73% | 42% | 2.69 |
3. | Indy Eleven | 16 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 21:19 | 23 |
|
0.88 | 56% | 1.9 | 4.2 | 65% | 42% | 2.50 |
4. | Sporting Kansas City II | 16 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 21:30 | 16 |
|
1.13 | 75% | 2.0 | 2.8 | 93% | 89% | 3.19 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Hartford Athletic | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 31:24 | 35 |
|
2.38 | 63% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 86% | 73% | 3.44 |
2. | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 16 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 39:10 | 34 |
|
2.38 | 31% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 75% | 69% | 3.06 |
3. | New York RB II | 16 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 30:37 | 15 |
|
1.13 | 63% | 1.8 | 5.3 | 89% | 83% | 4.19 |
4. | Bethlehem Steel | 16 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 20:45 | 9 |
|
0.63 | 56% | 1.6 | 4.3 | 94% | 75% | 4.06 |
5. | Loudoun United | 13 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 10:28 | 6 |
|
0.25 | 54% | 2.6 | 3.5 | 82% | 51% | 2.92 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Charlotte Independence | 16 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 24:22 | 28 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 0.2 | 0.4 | 75% | 56% | 2.88 |
2. | Birmingham Legion | 16 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 29:19 | 25 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.4 | 88% | 63% | 3.00 |
3. | North Carolina | 15 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 17:21 | 19 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 1.3 | 4.1 | 64% | 57% | 2.53 |
4. | Memphis 901 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 24:31 | 16 |
|
1.38 | 73% | 1.7 | 3.5 | 86% | 71% | 3.67 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 25:11 | 33 |
|
1.88 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 75% | 44% | 2.25 |
2. | Charleston Battery | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 26:15 | 30 |
|
2.38 | 53% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 79% | 47% | 2.73 |
3. | Miami FC II | 16 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 20:34 | 16 |
|
1.38 | 63% | 2.6 | 5.1 | 88% | 69% | 3.38 |
4. | Atlanta United II | 16 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 23:33 | 12 |
|
0.88 | 75% | 1.9 | 3.4 | 88% | 75% | 3.50 |