Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Oostenrijk - Landesliga: Burgenland - 08/31/24 10:30 - 5.Ronde
2-1 [95+5‘]
2-1 [95+5‘]
1-0 HT | ||
Unknown
[2-1]
|
89‘ | |
2-1 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 0 0
KAARTEN 0 0
ODDS
Opstellingen
SK Pama
Leithaprodersdorf
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/26/23 |
SK Pama
|
3-0 |
Leithaprodersdorf
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Teamvorm
SK Pama Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24.8 |
Edelserpentin
|
2 - 0 |
SK Pama
|
1-0 | 14 - 10 | 5 - 4 | 46 - 47 | 3 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
140 | 275 | 135 | |
18.8 |
SK Pama
|
5 - 0 |
Klingenbach
|
3-0 | 12 - 13 | 9 - 2 | 46 - 63 | 1 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-118 | 300 | 200 | |
9.8 |
Draßburg
|
1 - 2 |
SK Pama
|
1-0 | 14 - 9 | 4 - 4 | 41 - 41 | 2 - 3 |
0 (2%) 0 (0%) |
-164 | 300 | 300 | |
4.8 |
SK Pama
|
3 - 2 |
Schattendorf
|
0-2 | 5 - 4 | 1 - 3 | 70 - 33 | 9 - 4 |
0 (0%) 11 (0%) |
120 | 275 | 155 | |
27.7 |
Neufeld an der Leitha
|
1 - 3 |
SK Pama
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
19.7 |
USC Wallern
|
3 - 3 |
SK Pama
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Leithaprodersdorf Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23.8 |
Leithaprodersdorf
|
0 - 2 |
Horitschon
|
0-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
17.8 |
St. Margarethen
|
2 - 3 |
Leithaprodersdorf
|
1-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
9.8 |
Leithaprodersdorf
|
6 - 1 |
Pinkafeld
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
3.8 |
Mattersburg 2020
|
2 - 0 |
Leithaprodersdorf
|
2-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
26.7 |
Leithaprodersdorf
|
0 - 3 |
St. Margarethen
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
20.7 |
Tadten
|
0 - 3 |
Leithaprodersdorf
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standen
Burgenland | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Parndorf | 14 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 31:10 | 35 |
|
2.50 | 43% | 0.6 | 3.6 | 0% | 0% | 2.93 |
2. | Mattersburg 2020 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 32:16 | 32 |
|
2.63 | 53% | 1.1 | 2.3 | 0% | 0% | 3.20 |
3. | Horitschon | 14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 31:17 | 29 |
|
2.25 | 64% | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 3.43 |
4. | Deutschkreutz | 15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 24:10 | 29 |
|
2.25 | 47% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.27 |
5. | Halbturn | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 24:16 | 27 |
|
1.75 | 53% | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
6. | St. Margarethen | 14 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 23:18 | 25 |
|
2.25 | 57% | 0.6 | 2.4 | 0% | 0% | 2.93 |
7. | Leithaprodersdorf | 15 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 25:23 | 23 |
|
1.38 | 60% | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0% | 0% | 3.20 |
8. | Bad Sauerbrunn | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 25:16 | 21 |
|
1.75 | 64% | 1.0 | 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.93 |
9. | Jennersdorf | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 21:18 | 20 |
|
1.50 | 57% | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0% | 0% | 2.79 |
10. | Kohfidisch | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 24:27 | 19 |
|
1.75 | 64% | 0.6 | 2.4 | 0% | 0% | 3.64 |
11. | SK Pama | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 18:20 | 16 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 1.8 | 2.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.71 |
12. | Draßburg | 15 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 12:23 | 13 |
|
0.38 | 47% | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
13. | Edelserpentin | 15 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 13:34 | 11 |
|
0.13 | 47% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
14. | Pinkafeld | 15 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 11:33 | 9 |
|
0.75 | 40% | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0% | 0% | 2.93 |
15. | Schattendorf | 14 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 17:29 | 9 |
|
0.38 | 50% | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0% | 0% | 3.29 |
16. | Klingenbach | 15 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 6:27 | 6 |
|
0.38 | 33% | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.20 |