Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Duitsland - Oberliga: Hessen - 09/23/20 13:30 - 5.Ronde
1-1 [90‘]
1-1 [90‘]
HT | ||
1-1 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 0 0
KAARTEN 0 0
ODDS
Opstellingen
FV Bad Vilbel
Hunfelder SV
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/25/19 |
Hunfelder SV
|
3-3 |
FV Bad Vilbel
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
11/03/18 |
FV Bad Vilbel
|
2-2 |
Hunfelder SV
|
1-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Teamvorm
FV Bad Vilbel Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20.9 |
FV Bad Vilbel
|
1 - 2 |
Rot-Weiß Walldorf
|
1-1 | 8 - 18 | 4 - 8 | 32 - 46 | 5 - 9 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
15.9 |
Hanau 93
|
4 - 1 |
FV Bad Vilbel
|
2-1 | 20 - 15 | 8 - 7 | 49 - 46 | 7 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
12.9 |
FV Bad Vilbel
|
1 - 1 |
Baunatal
|
1-0 | 6 - 15 | 4 - 6 | 54 - 87 | 2 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
6.9 |
Neuhof
|
0 - 1 |
FV Bad Vilbel
|
0-1 | 6 - 7 | 4 - 1 | 99 - 56 | 0 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
30.8 |
FV Bad Vilbel
|
4 - 1 |
Neu-Anspach
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
27.8 |
Neu-Isenburg
|
2 - 2 |
FV Bad Vilbel
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Hunfelder SV Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19.9 |
Hunfelder SV
|
1 - 1 |
Fernwald
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
16.9 |
Hunfelder SV
|
0 - 1 |
Neuhof
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
13.9 |
Türk Gücü Friedberg
|
3 - 2 |
Hunfelder SV
|
2-0 | 15 - 10 | 10 - 5 | 90 - 74 | 7 - 0 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
5.9 |
Hunfelder SV
|
1 - 1 |
Rot-Weiß Walldorf
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
25.5 |
Hunfelder SV
|
3 - 3 |
FV Bad Vilbel
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
19.5 |
Ginsheim
|
5 - 2 |
Hunfelder SV
|
1-1 | 27 - 14 | 16 - 7 | 108 - 71 | 9 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standen
Hessen | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Barockstadt Fulda-Lehnerz | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 31:6 | 33 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 2.3 | 83% | 67% | 3.08 |
2. | Hessen Dreieich | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 37:11 | 31 |
|
2.38 | 58% | 1.1 | 2.3 | 100% | 83% | 4.00 |
3. | Rot-Weiß Walldorf | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 31:17 | 23 |
|
2.00 | 75% | 1.7 | 6.1 | 75% | 58% | 4.00 |
4. | Hanau 93 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 28:14 | 23 |
|
2.00 | 55% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 92% | 83% | 3.82 |
5. | Türk Gücü Friedberg | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 24:9 | 22 |
|
1.63 | 27% | 1.7 | 4.2 | 72% | 53% | 3.00 |
6. | Rot-Weiß Hadamar | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 15:15 | 19 |
|
1.25 | 33% | 1.6 | 5.8 | 75% | 42% | 2.50 |
7. | Waldgirmes | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 24:21 | 18 |
|
1.75 | 75% | 2.3 | 2.3 | 100% | 67% | 3.75 |
8. | Buchonia Flieden | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 20:17 | 18 |
|
1.38 | 58% | 1.7 | 1.9 | 100% | 67% | 3.08 |
9. | SV Zeilsheim | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 23:22 | 15 |
|
1.38 | 67% | 1.6 | 2.8 | 75% | 67% | 3.75 |
11. | SV Steinbach | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 15:17 | 15 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 0.8 | 1.0 | 83% | 33% | 2.67 |
12. | FV Bad Vilbel | 12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12:14 | 13 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 2.0 | 3.8 | 67% | 25% | 2.17 |
13. | Baunatal | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 14:19 | 13 |
|
1.50 | 82% | 2.8 | 6.5 | 83% | 57% | 3.00 |
14. | Neuhof | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 12:25 | 13 |
|
0.88 | 25% | 1.3 | 1.8 | 75% | 50% | 3.08 |
15. | Dietkirchen | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 16:34 | 13 |
|
0.75 | 50% | 1.4 | 2.5 | 100% | 83% | 4.17 |
16. | Ginsheim | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 17:25 | 11 |
|
0.88 | 50% | 1.8 | 4.0 | 83% | 67% | 3.50 |
17. | Viktoria Griesheim | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 12:16 | 10 |
|
0.75 | 50% | 1.4 | 3.4 | 83% | 42% | 2.33 |
18. | Hunfelder SV | 12 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 8:23 | 9 |
|
0.88 | 33% | 0.8 | 1.6 | 75% | 42% | 2.58 |
19. | Eddersheim | 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 19:28 | 8 |
|
0.63 | 73% | 1.7 | 4.6 | 100% | 63% | 4.27 |
20. | FC 1906 Erlensee | 11 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7:30 | 7 |
|
0.88 | 36% | 1.5 | 2.1 | 83% | 47% | 3.36 |