Preview match
USA - USL League Two - 06/01/24 18:00
Stadium
Capacity
0
Surface
Referee
ODDS
Lineups
Union Macomb
-
Bad results in last matches for Union Macomb
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach as the form record is (0W, 0D, 5L) with their average of 2.4 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (5) matches
Union Macomb have fail to win 5 matches in a row.
-
5 games lost in row. Time to tactic change?
Bad period for Union Macomb. Coach can not be satisfied with 5 games losing streak. It is highly possible that the coach will make a tactical change.
Midwest United
-
Midwest United have good form in the last 5 games
Coach can be satisfied with his team form (4W, 1D, 0L) from the last 5 games.
-
Unbeaten run (5) for Midwest United
Midwest United are unbeaten in their last 5 USL League Two games (4W, 1D). Players scored 9 goals and 3 conceded in that run.
Summary
H2H
1
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
0
0
FORM
0
2.6
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
0
1
Team Strength
Head to head
0%
100%
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/08/24 |
Midwest United
|
3-2 |
Union Macomb
|
2-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Team form
0.00
0.00 (+0%) total
2.17 (+334%) total
0.50
Union Macomb Last 5 Matches
18.6 |
Union Macomb
|
18:00 |
AFC Ann Arbor
|
|
14.6 |
South Bend Lions
|
18:00 |
Union Macomb
|
|
9.6 |
Kalamazoo FC
|
17:00 |
Union Macomb
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28.5 |
Lansing City
|
3 - 2 |
Union Macomb
|
1-0 | 4 - 4 | 3 - 0 | 37 - 44 | 9 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-167 | 260 | 375 | |
22.5 |
Michigan Bucks
|
1 - 0 |
Union Macomb
|
0-0 | 9 - 1 | 3 - 1 | 101 - 13 | 17 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-345 | 425 | 650 | |
18.5 |
Oakland County
|
1 - 0 |
Union Macomb
|
0-0 | 2 - 1 | 4 - 0 | 54 - 38 | 7 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-333 | 400 | 600 | |
11.5 |
AFC Ann Arbor
|
4 - 1 |
Union Macomb
|
2-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-175 | 300 | 333 | |
8.5 |
Midwest United
|
3 - 2 |
Union Macomb
|
2-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Midwest United Last 6 Matches
12.6 |
Oakland County
|
18:00 |
Midwest United
|
|
8.6 |
Michigan Bucks
|
19:00 |
Midwest United
|
|
5.6 |
Kalamazoo FC
|
19:00 |
Midwest United
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22.5 |
Midwest United
|
2 - 1 |
Oakland County
|
0-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
18.5 |
Midwest United
|
3 - 0 |
AFC Ann Arbor
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
15.5 |
Midwest United
|
1 - 0 |
South Bend Lions
|
1-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
11.5 |
Lansing City
|
0 - 0 |
Midwest United
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
8.5 |
Midwest United
|
3 - 2 |
Union Macomb
|
2-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
1.7 |
Oakland County
|
4 - 3 |
Midwest United
|
4-0 | 14 - 9 | 6 - 3 | 59 - 62 | 1 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
120 | 260 | 163 |
Standings
Central Conference | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deep North Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Milwaukee Bavarians | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5:1 | 6 |
|
3.00 | 50% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | RKC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6:1 | 3 |
|
3.00 | 100% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50% | 50% | 7.00 |
3. | St. Croix | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4:2 | 3 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 1.5 | 1.5 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |
4. | Rochester | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:11 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 0.7 | 0.7 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
5. | Thunder Bay Chill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
6. | Minneapolis City | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0:4 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.5 | 2.5 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
Great Lakes Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Midwest United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
2. | Kalamazoo FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 1.0 | 2.7 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |
3. | Michigan Bucks | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 0.3 | 5.7 | 50% | 50% | 1.33 |
4. | AFC Ann Arbor | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7:6 | 7 |
|
1.75 | 50% | 0.8 | 2.0 | 83% | 83% | 3.25 |
5. | Lansing City | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3:3 | 5 |
|
1.25 | 25% | 0.0 | 2.3 | 25% | 25% | 1.50 |
6. | Oakland County | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 0.3 | 3.0 | 25% | 25% | 1.67 |
7. | South Bend Lions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
8. | Union Macomb | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5:12 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 60% | 0.8 | 2.0 | 30% | 30% | 3.40 |
Heartland Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Peoria | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 0.7 | 2.7 | 100% | 75% | 4.00 |
2. | Des Moines Menace | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6:1 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 100% | 50% | 2.33 |
3. | St. Charles | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
4. | River Light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
5. | Sueno | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
6. | Chicago City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
7. | Chicago Dutch Lions | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0:15 | 1 |
|
0.25 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 3.75 |
Valley Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Fort Wayne | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 2.3 | 25% | 25% | 2.00 |
2. | Cleveland Force | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
3. | Buffalo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
4. | Kings Hammer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
5. | Dayton Dutch Lions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
6. | Toledo Villa | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1:5 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 50% | 1.5 | 3.5 | 25% | 25% | 3.00 |
Cup situation
Competitions |
---|
Competitions |
---|