Preview match
MATCH REPORT
China - Super League - 11/02/24 03:30 - 30.Round
1-0 [93+4‘]
1-0 [93+4‘]
(Penalty)
Sarić
[1-0]
|
37‘ | |
1-0 HT | ||
Yonghao
Wang
|
67‘ | |
Lopes
Zhong
|
67‘ | |
80‘ |
Yao
Liu
|
|
Boakye
Wenjie
|
87‘ | |
Long
Song
|
90‘+2 | |
Kangwa
Zheng
|
90‘+3 | |
1-0 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 0 0
CARDS 0 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | -164 | 320 | 400 | ||
Pre match odds | -182 | 320 | 475 |
Goals | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
2.5 | -105 | -118 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
10.0 | -115 | -109 |
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
Qingdao Hainiu
Status: Confirmed lineup
Cangzhou
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
Qingdao Hainiu
-
Bad results in last matches for Qingdao Hainiu
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach Yasen Petrov as the form record is (0W, 1D, 4L) with their average of 2.2 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (5) matches
Qingdao Hainiu have failed to win 5 matches in a row. Last win was against Shenzhen Peng City (1-0) on 17.8.24
-
4 games lost in row. Time to tactic change?
Bad period for Qingdao Hainiu. Coach Yasen Petrov can not be satisfied with 4 games losing streak. It is highly possible that the coach will make a tactical change.
Cangzhou
-
Zhao is back. Boost for the team
Good news for the team. Key player Yingjie Zhao (26 matches, 1 goals, 2 assists) is back after his missing.
-
Héber is a fresh missing
Coach Xiaopeng Li is without his key player Héber (24 matches, 8 goals, 4 assists). Reason: not available. His absence can be a big blow for the team.
-
Bad results in last matches for Cangzhou
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach Xiaopeng Li as the form record is (1W, 2D, 2L) with their average of 1.4 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (4) matches
Cangzhou have failed to win 4 matches in a row. Last win was against Meizhou Hakka (2-1) on 14.9.24
-
Poor form in away games
2 losses in 5 games. (1W, 2D, 2L) is the record in away games. With their average of 1.4 goals conceded per game.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/16/24 |
Cangzhou
|
0-1 |
Qingdao Hainiu
|
0-1 | 11 - 13 | 1- 5 | 52 - 48 | 3 - 7 |
7 (61%) 1 (59%) |
200 | 250 | 120 | |
11/04/23 |
Cangzhou
|
0-0 |
Qingdao Hainiu
|
0-0 | 13 - 11 | 3- 2 | 45 - 49 | 6 - 4 |
4 (47%) 10 (12%) |
170 | 240 | 160 | |
07/07/23 |
Qingdao Hainiu
|
1-1 |
Cangzhou
|
0-0 | 13 - 11 | 4- 7 | 38 - 27 | 6 - 3 |
4 (55%) 3 (59%) |
175 | 230 | 163 |
Team form
Qingdao Hainiu Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27.10 |
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
|
1 - 0 |
Qingdao Hainiu
|
1-0 | 16 - 7 | 8 - 2 | 36 - 23 | 6 - 3 |
2 (67%) 3 (61%) |
-133 | 290 | 333 | |
19.10 |
Beijing Guoan
|
6 - 0 |
Qingdao Hainiu
|
2-0 | 16 - 19 | 8 - 4 | 36 - 53 | 2 - 5 |
0 (73%) 3 (55%) |
-250 | 350 | 650 | |
28.9 |
Qingdao Hainiu
|
0 - 1 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
0-1 | 15 - 12 | 6 - 3 | 64 - 33 | 5 - 5 |
2 (58%) 3 (60%) |
650 | 525 | -357 | |
22.9 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
2 - 1 |
Qingdao Hainiu
|
1-0 | 21 - 13 | 8 - 5 | 72 - 28 | 6 - 1 |
2 (53%) 0 (54%) |
115 | 240 | 230 | |
15.9 |
Qingdao Hainiu
|
1 - 1 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
1-0 | 9 - 14 | 2 - 5 | 43 - 39 | 6 - 3 |
1 (53%) 3 (47%) |
230 | 230 | 115 | |
17.8 |
Qingdao Hainiu
|
1 - 0 |
Shenzhen Peng City
|
1-0 | 5 - 12 | 1 - 5 | 34 - 80 | 0 - 2 |
4 (45%) 3 (37%) |
150 | 240 | 170 |
Cangzhou Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27.10 |
Cangzhou
|
0 - 1 |
Shanghai Port
|
0-1 | 4 - 28 | 1 - 9 | 23 - 103 | 3 - 12 |
1 (71%) 6 (63%) |
2000 | 900 | -1250 | |
20.10 |
Cangzhou
|
0 - 0 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
0-0 | 6 - 10 | 2 - 1 | 31 - 29 | 2 - 1 |
1 (66%) 2 (55%) |
230 | 240 | 110 | |
29.9 |
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
|
3 - 2 |
Cangzhou
|
1-1 | 36 - 8 | 12 - 4 | 64 - 28 | 13 - 2 |
2 (63%) 1 (64%) |
-175 | 333 | 400 | |
22.9 |
Zhejiang
|
2 - 2 |
Cangzhou
|
0-2 | 40 - 8 | 10 - 4 | 79 - 13 | 8 - 1 |
7 (39%) 2 (57%) |
-208 | 375 | 475 | |
14.9 |
Cangzhou
|
2 - 1 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
2-0 | 10 - 20 | 5 - 8 | 27 - 75 | 7 - 14 |
3 (49%) 0 (55%) |
190 | 240 | 135 | |
16.8 |
Henan Songshan Longmen
|
0 - 2 |
Cangzhou
|
0-1 | 17 - 7 | 4 - 2 | 72 - 13 | 8 - 0 |
4 (36%) 2 (55%) |
170 | 250 | 150 |
Standings
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Shanghai Port | 30 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 96:30 | 78 |
|
2.25 | 57% | 1.6 | 7.5 | 94% | 75% | 4.20 |
2. | Shanghai Shenhua | 30 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 73:20 | 77 |
|
2.75 | 50% | 1.7 | 7.2 | 88% | 40% | 3.10 |
3. | Chengdu Rongcheng | 30 | 18 | 5 | 7 | 65:31 | 59 |
|
1.38 | 53% | 1.9 | 6.7 | 80% | 60% | 3.20 |
4. | Beijing Guoan | 30 | 16 | 8 | 6 | 65:35 | 56 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.0 | 4.9 | 83% | 67% | 3.33 |
5. | Shandong Taishan | 30 | 13 | 9 | 8 | 49:40 | 48 |
|
1.75 | 50% | 2.0 | 6.3 | 65% | 58% | 2.97 |
6. | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 30 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 44:47 | 42 |
|
1.88 | 60% | 1.3 | 4.9 | 73% | 53% | 3.03 |
7. | Zhejiang | 30 | 11 | 5 | 14 | 55:60 | 38 |
|
0.88 | 67% | 2.3 | 6.6 | 82% | 75% | 3.83 |
8. | Henan Songshan Longmen | 30 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 34:39 | 36 |
|
1.00 | 53% | 1.9 | 6.6 | 82% | 63% | 2.43 |
9. | Changchun Yatai | 30 | 8 | 8 | 14 | 46:58 | 32 |
|
1.38 | 60% | 1.9 | 3.8 | 66% | 53% | 3.47 |
10. | Qingdao Youth Island | 30 | 8 | 8 | 14 | 41:58 | 32 |
|
1.75 | 63% | 2.2 | 4.0 | 75% | 50% | 3.30 |
11. | Wuhan Three Towns | 30 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 31:44 | 31 |
|
0.63 | 57% | 1.9 | 5.0 | 69% | 56% | 2.50 |
12. | Cangzhou | 30 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 33:57 | 29 |
|
1.38 | 53% | 1.8 | 3.1 | 81% | 54% | 3.00 |
13. | Shenzhen Peng City | 30 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 29:55 | 29 |
|
0.63 | 53% | 2.3 | 4.4 | 75% | 56% | 2.80 |
14. | Qingdao Hainiu | 30 | 8 | 5 | 17 | 28:55 | 29 |
|
0.88 | 37% | 1.8 | 3.9 | 54% | 28% | 2.77 |
15. | Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 29:55 | 27 |
|
0.88 | 53% | 2.2 | 4.8 | 50% | 33% | 2.80 |
16. | Nantong Zhiyun | 30 | 5 | 7 | 18 | 32:66 | 22 |
|
0.88 | 67% | 2.4 | 4.4 | 81% | 44% | 3.27 |