Preview match
MATCH REPORT
USA - NISA - 05/28/22 22:00
1-0 [90‘]
1-0 [90‘]
9‘ |
Veerakone
|
|
23‘ |
Deas
|
|
34‘ |
Unknown
|
|
0-0 HT | ||
Contreras
Unknown
|
46‘ | |
Lee
Unknown
|
46‘ | |
Treinen
Salguero
|
48‘ | |
Kawashima
Thierjung
|
61‘ | |
Thierjung
[1-0]
|
62‘ | |
Kadono
|
75‘ | |
Kadono
Villalobos Carbajal
|
86‘ | |
1-0 FT |
Goals and Highlights
Match stats
CARDS 1 0
CARDS 3 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | -714 | 650 | 800 | ||
Pre match odds | -714 | 650 | 1100 |
Goals | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
2.5 | 135 | -175 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
9.5 | 100 | -125 |
Lineups
California Utd Strikers
-
California Utd Strikers have good form in the last 5 games
Coach D. Ebert can be satisfied with his team form (5W, 0D, 0L) from the last 5 games.
-
Unbeaten run (7) for California Utd Strikers
California Utd Strikers are unbeaten in their last 7 NISA games (5W, 2D). Players scored 10 goals and 4 conceded in that run.
Flower City Union
-
Bad results in last matches for Flower City Union
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach Z. Agliata as the form record is (2W, 0D, 3L) with their average of 2.2 goals conceded per game.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/04/22 |
Flower City Union
|
1-2 |
California Utd Strikers
|
1-1 | 16 - 20 | 6- 10 | 90 - 83 | 5 - 6 |
0 (14%) 11 (14%) |
450 | 275 | -182 |
Team form
California Utd Strikers Last 6 Matches
17.6 |
Valley United
|
22:00 |
California Utd Strikers
|
|
10.6 |
ASC San Diego
|
21:00 |
California Utd Strikers
|
|
5.6 |
California Utd Strikers
|
19:00 |
Michigan Stars
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14.5 |
Bay Cities
|
0 - 1 |
California Utd Strikers
|
0-0 | 3 - 5 | 2 - 3 | 35 - 50 | 1 - 7 |
0 (20%) 11 (21%) |
120 | 260 | 160 | |
11.5 |
California Utd Strikers
|
2 - 3 |
LA Galaxy
|
1-1 | 5 - 20 | 3 - 9 | 28 - 51 | 0 - 11 |
2 (13%) 9 (23%) |
900 | 600 | -588 | |
4.5 |
Flower City Union
|
1 - 2 |
California Utd Strikers
|
1-1 | 16 - 20 | 6 - 10 | 90 - 83 | 5 - 6 |
0 (14%) 11 (14%) |
450 | 275 | -182 | |
1.5 |
Syracuse Pulse
|
0 - 1 |
California Utd Strikers
|
0-0 | 10 - 10 | 3 - 4 | 71 - 69 | 5 - 5 |
0 (0%) 11 (14%) |
240 | 275 | -118 | |
23.4 |
California Utd Strikers
|
4 - 3 |
Bay Cities
|
2-2 | 14 - 10 | 8 - 9 | 102 - 83 | 8 - 7 |
0 (14%) 11 (31%) |
-175 | 275 | 375 | |
19.4 |
Tucson
|
1 - 2 |
California Utd Strikers
|
1-0 | - | - | - | - |
3 (29%) 2 (6%) |
- | - | - |
Flower City Union Last 6 Matches
11.6 |
Michigan Stars
|
19:00 |
Flower City Union
|
|
4.6 |
Flower City Union
|
18:00 |
Valley United
|
|
1.6 |
Bay Cities
|
20:30 |
Flower City Union
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21.5 |
Flower City Union
|
1 - 5 |
Chattanooga
|
1-4 | 4 - 13 | 1 - 5 | 30 - 57 | 1 - 5 |
0 (9%) 11 (15%) |
275 | 260 | -133 | |
14.5 |
Flower City Union
|
2 - 1 |
Maryland Bobcats
|
1-0 | 3 - 10 | 3 - 3 | 31 - 66 | 2 - 6 |
0 (11%) 0 (0%) |
800 | 450 | -455 | |
8.5 |
Syracuse Pulse
|
3 - 1 |
Flower City Union
|
1-1 | 7 - 5 | 5 - 2 | 45 - 33 | 4 - 3 |
0 (0%) 11 (12%) |
-133 | 230 | 320 | |
4.5 |
Flower City Union
|
1 - 2 |
California Utd Strikers
|
1-1 | 16 - 20 | 6 - 10 | 90 - 83 | 5 - 6 |
0 (14%) 11 (14%) |
450 | 275 | -182 | |
30.4 |
Chattanooga
|
0 - 1 |
Flower City Union
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 |
0 (15%) 11 (16%) |
-400 | 400 | 800 | |
23.4 |
Flower City Union
|
0 - 1 |
Maryland Bobcats
|
0-1 | 8 - 11 | 5 - 6 | 102 - 130 | 5 - 3 |
0 (19%) 0 (0%) |
750 | 500 | -455 |
Standings
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
East | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Chattanooga | 25 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 44:21 | 50 |
|
2.25 | 48% | 1.4 | 3.8 | 71% | 58% | 2.60 |
2. | Michigan Stars | 23 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 27:15 | 38 |
|
1.75 | 22% | 2.3 | 4.1 | 61% | 34% | 1.83 |
3. | Maryland Bobcats | 23 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 32:28 | 30 |
|
1.13 | 57% | 2.2 | 3.4 | 78% | 47% | 2.61 |
4. | Syracuse Pulse | 22 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 23:33 | 22 |
|
1.38 | 41% | 1.7 | 3.7 | 77% | 62% | 2.55 |
5. | Flower City Union | 24 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 15:58 | 12 |
|
0.13 | 39% | 2.0 | 2.1 | 74% | 65% | 3.04 |
West | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | California Utd Strikers | 21 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 32:12 | 44 |
|
1.50 | 29% | 0.8 | 5.2 | 55% | 35% | 2.10 |
2. | ASC San Diego | 23 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 30:29 | 33 |
|
1.50 | 61% | 2.4 | 3.0 | 80% | 60% | 2.57 |
3. | Bay Cities | 13 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 18:20 | 15 |
|
1.25 | 54% | 1.6 | 3.3 | 71% | 65% | 2.92 |
4. | LA Force | 19 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 13:25 | 15 |
|
0.63 | 39% | 1.9 | 4.3 | 63% | 43% | 2.00 |
5. | Valley United | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 11:4 | 16 |
|
1.88 | 22% | 2.0 | 2.7 | 100% | 78% | 1.67 |
Cup situation
Competitions | |
---|---|
Round of 32 |
Competitions | |
---|---|
US Open Cup
vs Manhattan 04/04/23
|
2nd Round |
NISA Independent Cup
vs North Jersey Alliance 07/24/22
|
Regional Finals |