Preview match
MATCH REPORT
Asia - AFC Champions League - 07/10/21 10:00 - 6.Round
0-3 [90‘]
0-3 [90‘]
45‘+1 |
Bill
(Missed penalty)
|
|
Kopitović
|
45‘+2 | |
0-0 HT | ||
bin Khaizan
Bennett
|
46‘ | |
Mohana
Najeeb
|
46‘ | |
63‘ |
Amorim
Punya
|
|
64‘ |
Chamnarnsilp
Srisai
|
|
Tan
Nawaz
|
69‘ | |
72‘ |
Thinjom
Singmui
|
|
75‘ |
0-1
Amorim
|
|
Mehmedović
|
77‘ | |
82‘ |
0-2
Bill
(Thinjom)
|
|
Mehmedović
Abdul Aziz
|
83‘ | |
86‘ |
Pattanapol
Tiatrakul
|
|
86‘ |
Sawasdee
Bill
|
|
bin Arismail
Reefdy bin Muhammad Hasyim
|
89‘ | |
90‘ |
0-3
Sukjitthammakul
|
|
0-3 FT |
Goals and Highlights
Match stats
CARDS 2 0
CARDS 0 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | 800 | 425 | -333 | ||
Pre match odds | 800 | 425 | -333 |
Goals | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
2.5 | 150 | -200 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
9 | 100 | -125 |
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
Tampines Rovers
Status: Confirmed lineup
Singha Chiangrai United
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
Tampines Rovers
-
Bad results in last matches for Tampines Rovers
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach G. Lee as the form record is (0W, 0D, 5L) with their average of 4.8 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (5) matches
Tampines Rovers have fail to win 5 matches in a row.
-
5 games lost in row. Time to tactic change?
Bad period for Tampines Rovers. Coach G. Lee can not be satisfied with 5 games losing streak. It is highly possible that the coach will make a tactical change.
Singha Chiangrai United
-
Bad results in last matches for Singha Chiangrai United
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach A. Thongaum as the form record is (1W, 2D, 2L) with their average of 1.4 goals conceded per game.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/28/21 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
1-0 |
Tampines Rovers
|
0-0 | 14 - 13 | 2- 4 | 78 - 92 | 3 - 9 |
2 (46%) 1 (73%) |
-250 | 333 | 600 |
Team form
Tampines Rovers Last 6 Matches
25.8 |
Geylang International
|
07:45 |
Tampines Rovers
|
|
19.8 |
Balestier Khalsa
|
07:45 |
Tampines Rovers
|
|
15.8 |
Home United
|
05:30 |
Tampines Rovers
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.7 |
Gamba Osaka
|
8 - 1 |
Tampines Rovers
|
3-1 | 29 - 10 | 17 - 3 | 88 - 34 | 7 - 2 |
7 (37%) 3 (71%) |
-2500 | 1000 | 1400 | |
4.7 |
Tampines Rovers
|
0 - 4 |
Jeonbuk Motors
|
0-1 | 4 - 18 | 1 - 11 | 26 - 80 | 2 - 8 |
4 (70%) 8 (33%) |
2000 | 1400 | -5000 | |
1.7 |
Jeonbuk Motors
|
9 - 0 |
Tampines Rovers
|
4-0 | 15 - 4 | 10 - 1 | 76 - 35 | 10 - 2 |
7 (35%) 4 (72%) |
-1667 | 900 | 1400 | |
28.6 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
1 - 0 |
Tampines Rovers
|
0-0 | 14 - 13 | 2 - 4 | 78 - 92 | 3 - 9 |
2 (46%) 1 (73%) |
-250 | 333 | 600 | |
25.6 |
Tampines Rovers
|
0 - 2 |
Gamba Osaka
|
0-1 | 5 - 15 | 3 - 6 | 68 - 110 | 3 - 8 |
3 (71%) 9 (55%) |
1100 | 600 | -769 | |
22.5 |
Tampines Rovers
|
2 - 3 |
Hougang United
|
1-1 | 27 - 16 | 10 - 10 | 99 - 68 | 11 - 4 |
2 (75%) 1 (67%) |
-250 | 333 | 500 |
Singha Chiangrai United Last 6 Matches
18.9 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
07:00 |
Ratchaburi Mitrphol FC
|
|
11.9 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
07:00 |
Nakhonratchasima Mazda FC
|
|
5.9 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
07:00 |
Samut Prakan City
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.7 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
1 - 3 |
Jeonbuk Motors
|
0-3 | 12 - 14 | 4 - 5 | 58 - 52 | 6 - 6 |
1 (54%) 8 (40%) |
750 | 475 | -455 | |
4.7 |
Gamba Osaka
|
1 - 1 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
0-1 | 10 - 9 | 4 - 3 | 72 - 43 | 4 - 2 |
9 (54%) 3 (50%) |
-345 | 350 | 800 | |
1.7 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
1 - 1 |
Gamba Osaka
|
0-0 | 6 - 8 | 2 - 5 | 63 - 81 | 3 - 4 |
4 (44%) 10 (24%) |
425 | 333 | -222 | |
28.6 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
1 - 0 |
Tampines Rovers
|
0-0 | 14 - 13 | 2 - 4 | 78 - 92 | 3 - 9 |
2 (46%) 1 (73%) |
-250 | 333 | 600 | |
25.6 |
Jeonbuk Motors
|
2 - 1 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
1-0 | 8 - 11 | 5 - 2 | 65 - 47 | 2 - 4 |
4 (38%) 0 (51%) |
-455 | 375 | 1100 | |
11.4 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
1 - 1 |
Chonburi FC
|
1-1 | 9 - 11 | 6 - 8 | 58 - 62 | 2 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standings
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Hilal | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 3.33 |
2. | Istiqlol Dushanbe | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 4.3 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 |
4. | OKMK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:13 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 83% | 1.7 | 5.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Sharjah | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:6 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Tractor Sazi | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6:3 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 17% | 1.7 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
3. | Pakhtakor | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6:8 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 50% | 33% | 2.33 |
4. | Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2:6 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 17% | 2.7 | 3.0 | 17% | 17% | 1.33 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Esteghlal | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14:8 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 0.8 | 4.7 | 50% | 0% | 3.67 |
2. | Al Duhail | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.3 | 6.0 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
3. | Al Ahli | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.83 |
4. | Al Shorta | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3:12 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 1.3 | 4.0 | 83% | 67% | 2.50 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Nassr | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
2. | Al Sadd | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 2.3 | 6.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Al Wihdat | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4:7 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 1.8 | 3.2 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 |
4. | Foolad | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3:6 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 33% | 1.3 | 5.8 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Persepolis | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14:5 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 0% | 0.7 | 0.8 | 50% | 50% | 3.17 |
2. | Al Wahda | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 100% | 2.5 | 5.7 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
3. | Goa | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2:9 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 2.2 | 67% | 33% | 1.83 |
4. | Al Rayyan | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6:12 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 67% | 50% | 3.00 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Ulsan | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13:1 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | BG Pathum United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.67 |
3. | Viettel | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:9 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 17% | 2.0 | 3.2 | 67% | 50% | 2.67 |
4. | Kaya | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:16 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.5 | 67% | 67% | 3.00 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Nagoya Grampus | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14:2 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.7 | 50% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | Pohang Steelers | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 3.7 | 2.8 | 50% | 33% | 2.00 |
4. | Ratchaburi Mitrphol FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0:10 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 0% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 50% | 33% | 1.67 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Jeonbuk Motors | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22:5 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 67% | 1.0 | 5.3 | 50% | 50% | 4.50 |
2. | Gamba Osaka | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 15:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.2 | 5.5 | 100% | 50% | 3.67 |
3. | Singha Chiangrai United | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:7 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 83% | 50% | 2.50 |
4. | Tampines Rovers | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:27 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 17% | 1.2 | 3.7 | 83% | 67% | 4.67 |
Group I | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Kawasaki Frontale | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27:3 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 0.3 | 8.5 | 0% | 0% | 5.00 |
2. | Daegu | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 5.8 | 50% | 50% | 4.67 |
3. | Ceres Philippines | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4:24 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 67% | 4.67 |
4. | Beijing Guoan | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:23 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 33% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 100% | 83% | 4.33 |
Group J | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Cerezo Osaka | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13:2 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 1.3 | 6.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Kitchee | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 2.2 | 6.2 | 50% | 17% | 1.50 |
3. | Port FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 2.0 | 5.5 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
4. | Guangzhou Evergrande | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:17 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 17% | 1.7 | 1.5 | 67% | 50% | 3.00 |
Cup situation
Competitions | |
---|---|
Eliminated | |
AFC Cup
vs Ayeyawady United 06/23/22
|
Group Stage |
Singapore Cup
vs Geylang International 10/28/22
|
Group Stage |
Competitions | |
---|---|
AFC Champions League
vs Kitchee 04/16/22
|
Group Stage |
1st Round | |
League Cup
vs Phitsanulok 01/12/22
|
1st Round |