Pregled utakmice
MATCH REPORT
Brazil - Serie D - 06/16/24 15:00 - 9.Kolo
0-0 [90‘]
0-0 [90‘]
Thalheimer
|
25‘ | |
30‘ |
Hugo
|
|
0-0 HT | ||
Unknown
|
80‘ | |
0-0 FT |
Statistike utakmice
KARTONI 4 1
KARTONI 0 1
KVOTE
Utakmica | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Početne kvote | 170 | 190 | 150 | ||
Kvote prije utakmice | 140 | 190 | 180 |
Azijski hendikep | |||
---|---|---|---|
Linija | 1 | 2 | Linija |
-0.25 | 101 | -147 | +0.25 |
+0 | -141 | 105 | -0 |
+0.25 | -213 | 142 | -0.25 |
Golovi | ||
---|---|---|
Linija | Ispod | Preko |
2.5 | -227 | 163 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Linija | Ispod | Preko |
9.5 | -125 | 100 |
Sastavi
Status: Potvrđena postava
Novo Hamburgo
Status: Potvrđena postava
Cascavel
Sastavi
Statistike:
KLUPA
Novo Hamburgo
-
Nema svježih ozljeda, ista početna postava?
Trener može koristiti istu posljednju početnu postavu jer nema prijavljenih velikih odsutnosti za ovu utakmicu.
Cascavel
-
Druga odsutnost za Everton Sena
Trener G. Kleina je još uvijek bez ključnog igrača Everton Sena (6 utakmice, 1 golovi, 0 asistencije). Razlog: nije dostupno.
-
Peu je svježa odsutnost
Trener G. Kleina je bez ključnog igrača Peu (6 utakmice, 1 golovi, 0 asistencije). Razlog: nije dostupno. Njegova odsutnost može biti veliki udarac za tim.
-
Loši rezultati u posljednjim utakmicama za Cascavel
Loša forma u posljednjih 5 utakmica. Nije lako razdoblje za igrače i trenera G. Kleina jer je forma (0P, 3R, 2I) s prosjekom od 0.4 primljenih golova po utakmici.
-
Niz bez pobjeda (7) utakmica
Cascavel nisu uspjeli pobijediti 7 utakmice zaredom. Posljednja pobjeda bila je protiv Avenida (1-2) na 27.4.24
-
Trener se mora nositi s 5 svježim odsutnostima
Prema vijestima, tim je bez 5 svježe odsutnosti. Ovi igrači se pridružuju popisu odsutnih: Robinho, Gianezini, Peu, Juninho, Goiás.
Sažetak
H2H
H2H (DOMA/GOST)
FORMA
FORMA (DOMA/GOST)
Snaga tima
Usporedba
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/02/24 |
Cascavel
|
0-0 |
Novo Hamburgo
|
0-0 | 2 - 1 | 1- 0 | 31 - 28 | 10 - 4 |
5 (41%) 4 (30%) |
-175 | 275 | 350 |
Forma tima
Novo Hamburgo Last 6 Matches
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.6 |
Hercílio Luz
|
1 - 2 |
Novo Hamburgo
|
1-2 | 7 - 3 | 2 - 2 | 142 - 53 | 11 - 3 |
1 (59%) 0 (33%) |
-118 | 190 | 333 | |
8.6 |
Novo Hamburgo
|
1 - 1 |
Hercílio Luz
|
1-0 | 13 - 9 | 7 - 3 | 76 - 77 | 7 - 5 |
0 (32%) 3 (58%) |
175 | 200 | 140 | |
2.6 |
Cascavel
|
0 - 0 |
Novo Hamburgo
|
0-0 | 2 - 1 | 1 - 0 | 31 - 28 | 10 - 4 |
5 (41%) 4 (30%) |
-175 | 275 | 350 | |
28.4 |
Barra FC
|
1 - 1 |
Novo Hamburgo
|
1-0 | 10 - 4 | 3 - 1 | 68 - 44 | 5 - 2 |
4 (66%) 8 (49%) |
-137 | 225 | 375 | |
2.3 |
Novo Hamburgo
|
0 - 1 |
Caxias
|
0-0 | 4 - 5 | 1 - 2 | 40 - 28 | 2 - 5 |
4 (41%) 1 (60%) |
160 | 175 | 188 | |
26.2 |
EC São José
|
3 - 0 |
Novo Hamburgo
|
1-0 | 10 - 6 | 8 - 4 | 38 - 38 | 6 - 3 |
1 (54%) 1 (51%) |
-149 | 250 | 400 |
Cascavel Last 6 Matches
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.6 |
Cascavel
|
0 - 0 |
Brasil de Pelotas
|
0-0 | 3 - 0 | 3 - 0 | 27 - 12 | 7 - 1 |
5 (52%) 4 (41%) |
-133 | 260 | 300 | |
9.6 |
Brasil de Pelotas
|
1 - 0 |
Cascavel
|
0-0 | 12 - 20 | 3 - 5 | 21 - 41 | 1 - 12 |
2 (45%) 1 (50%) |
115 | 210 | 200 | |
2.6 |
Cascavel
|
0 - 0 |
Novo Hamburgo
|
0-0 | 2 - 1 | 1 - 0 | 31 - 28 | 10 - 4 |
5 (41%) 4 (30%) |
-175 | 275 | 350 | |
26.5 |
Concórdia Atlético Clube
|
1 - 0 |
Cascavel
|
0-0 | 9 - 6 | 3 - 1 | 40 - 34 | 5 - 0 |
2 (48%) 4 (43%) |
140 | 190 | 180 | |
21.5 |
Cascavel
|
0 - 0 |
Hercílio Luz
|
0-0 | 6 - 11 | 4 - 4 | 30 - 30 | 8 - 7 |
6 (40%) 0 (58%) |
125 | 210 | 200 | |
12.5 |
Barra FC
|
3 - 0 |
Cascavel
|
1-0 | 9 - 16 | 5 - 3 | 33 - 36 | 2 - 7 |
1 (58%) 2 (35%) |
-105 | 220 | 250 |
Poredak
1st Phase | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Manauara | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 35:7 | 34 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 2.6 | 6.3 | 79% | 67% | 3.00 |
2. | Porto Velho | 14 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 29:15 | 28 |
|
2.00 | 57% | 2.2 | 3.1 | 75% | 55% | 3.14 |
3. | Princesa Solimões | 13 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 20:13 | 24 |
|
2.13 | 38% | 2.5 | 6.5 | 68% | 55% | 2.54 |
4. | Manaus | 13 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 18:15 | 23 |
|
2.00 | 38% | 2.6 | 5.8 | 68% | 33% | 2.54 |
5. | Trem | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 18:22 | 18 |
|
1.00 | 71% | 1.6 | 4.6 | 80% | 70% | 2.86 |
6. | São Raimundo RR | 14 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 16:24 | 16 |
|
1.50 | 57% | 1.9 | 5.9 | 65% | 35% | 2.86 |
7. | Rio Branco | 14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 14:25 | 12 |
|
0.50 | 71% | 2.8 | 3.8 | 90% | 60% | 2.79 |
8. | Humaitá | 14 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7:36 | 1 |
|
0.13 | 36% | 2.0 | 2.5 | 60% | 60% | 3.07 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Maranhão | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 22:9 | 27 |
|
1.88 | 36% | 2.6 | 4.6 | 75% | 33% | 2.21 |
2. | Altos | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 22:16 | 24 |
|
2.00 | 64% | 3.2 | 3.7 | 90% | 45% | 2.71 |
3. | Ríver | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 20:16 | 19 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 2.6 | 4.9 | 80% | 50% | 2.57 |
4. | Tocantinópolis | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 15:19 | 19 |
|
1.13 | 43% | 2.5 | 4.1 | 60% | 50% | 2.43 |
5. | Cametá | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 17:17 | 16 |
|
1.50 | 57% | 0.8 | 2.6 | 55% | 33% | 2.43 |
6. | Fluminense PI | 14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 14:19 | 15 |
|
0.88 | 50% | 3.1 | 4.4 | 65% | 43% | 2.36 |
7. | Moto Club MA | 14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 17:24 | 15 |
|
0.75 | 79% | 2.1 | 4.6 | 90% | 60% | 2.93 |
8. | Águia de Marabá | 14 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 12:19 | 14 |
|
1.25 | 50% | 1.9 | 5.7 | 90% | 40% | 2.21 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Treze | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 28:9 | 31 |
|
1.88 | 43% | 2.7 | 4.7 | 100% | 40% | 2.64 |
2. | Iguatu | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 14:8 | 27 |
|
2.00 | 14% | 2.7 | 4.1 | 45% | 20% | 1.57 |
3. | América RN | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 18:9 | 26 |
|
2.13 | 43% | 2.8 | 5.9 | 68% | 23% | 1.93 |
4. | FC Atlético Cearense | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 14:16 | 18 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 3.1 | 3.1 | 80% | 40% | 2.14 |
5. | Sousa | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 12:14 | 18 |
|
1.63 | 21% | 2.2 | 5.1 | 58% | 20% | 1.86 |
6. | Santa Cruz de Natal RN | 14 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 17:25 | 16 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 2.1 | 4.9 | 90% | 55% | 3.00 |
7. | Maracanã | 14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 13:21 | 12 |
|
0.88 | 50% | 2.6 | 5.0 | 65% | 55% | 2.43 |
8. | Potiguar Mossoró | 14 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 7:21 | 7 |
|
0.50 | 36% | 2.4 | 3.9 | 78% | 48% | 2.00 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Itabaiana | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 21:11 | 26 |
|
1.88 | 43% | 2.8 | 5.0 | 78% | 35% | 2.29 |
2. | Retrô | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 21:12 | 26 |
|
2.25 | 50% | 2.2 | 5.4 | 45% | 45% | 2.36 |
3. | Jacuipense | 14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 15:13 | 23 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 2.9 | 5.4 | 55% | 33% | 2.00 |
4. | ASA | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 15:13 | 21 |
|
1.13 | 29% | 2.4 | 5.6 | 53% | 20% | 2.00 |
5. | CSE | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 18:17 | 21 |
|
2.00 | 64% | 2.6 | 5.1 | 90% | 33% | 2.50 |
6. | Juazeirense | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 13:13 | 21 |
|
2.25 | 43% | 2.7 | 5.7 | 53% | 13% | 1.86 |
7. | Petrolina | 14 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 6:19 | 10 |
|
0.25 | 21% | 2.6 | 4.1 | 55% | 10% | 1.79 |
8. | Sergipe | 14 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 11:22 | 9 |
|
0.50 | 36% | 2.1 | 4.0 | 55% | 33% | 2.36 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Brasiliense | 14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 27:10 | 32 |
|
2.38 | 57% | 2.1 | 4.6 | 70% | 50% | 2.64 |
2. | Anápolis | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 18:10 | 25 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 3.1 | 4.1 | 63% | 29% | 2.00 |
3. | Mixto | 14 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 18:13 | 22 |
|
1.88 | 71% | 2.5 | 4.9 | 80% | 40% | 2.21 |
4. | CRAC | 14 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 13:8 | 22 |
|
1.63 | 36% | 2.8 | 6.3 | 50% | 20% | 1.50 |
5. | Iporá | 14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 16:21 | 17 |
|
0.75 | 36% | 1.9 | 3.6 | 75% | 46% | 2.64 |
6. | União Rondonópolis | 14 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 14:15 | 16 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 1.8 | 3.7 | 50% | 20% | 2.07 |
7. | Real FC | 14 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 10:20 | 9 |
|
1.13 | 36% | 3.1 | 4.4 | 60% | 30% | 2.14 |
8. | Capital FC | 14 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10:29 | 8 |
|
0.50 | 43% | 2.6 | 2.4 | 70% | 60% | 2.79 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Nova Iguaçu | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 19:5 | 31 |
|
2.75 | 29% | 3.4 | 3.6 | 50% | 10% | 1.71 |
2. | Portuguesa RJ | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 18:6 | 25 |
|
1.88 | 36% | 2.1 | 5.8 | 71% | 29% | 1.71 |
3. | Itabuna | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 16:9 | 24 |
|
1.50 | 36% | 2.6 | 3.4 | 60% | 20% | 1.79 |
4. | Real Noroeste | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 16:15 | 20 |
|
1.63 | 43% | 3.6 | 5.2 | 60% | 20% | 2.21 |
5. | Serra | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 16:18 | 19 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 2.0 | 3.8 | 60% | 40% | 2.43 |
6. | Ipatinga | 14 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 8:18 | 11 |
|
0.75 | 21% | 2.4 | 5.1 | 60% | 30% | 1.86 |
7. | Democrata SL | 14 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 8:21 | 10 |
|
0.25 | 36% | 2.2 | 6.1 | 60% | 10% | 2.07 |
8. | Audax Rio | 14 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 10:19 | 9 |
|
1.00 | 36% | 2.9 | 3.4 | 58% | 38% | 2.07 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Maringá | 14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 25:10 | 32 |
|
2.38 | 43% | 2.3 | 4.9 | 70% | 50% | 2.50 |
2. | Inter de Limeira | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 16:7 | 24 |
|
1.00 | 14% | 2.0 | 5.4 | 40% | 40% | 1.64 |
3. | Água Santa | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 12:10 | 22 |
|
1.63 | 29% | 2.6 | 3.1 | 63% | 21% | 1.57 |
4. | Costa Rica - MS | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 16:17 | 21 |
|
2.00 | 29% | 1.8 | 1.9 | 70% | 50% | 2.36 |
5. | Santo André | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 15:13 | 20 |
|
1.75 | 36% | 1.7 | 4.0 | 50% | 30% | 2.00 |
6. | Pouso Alegre | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 11:9 | 14 |
|
0.88 | 21% | 1.4 | 5.4 | 30% | 20% | 1.43 |
7. | São José EC | 14 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 13:16 | 14 |
|
1.13 | 43% | 1.9 | 7.4 | 67% | 46% | 2.07 |
8. | CAP Patrocinense | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 6:32 | 5 |
|
0.38 | 29% | 2.2 | 3.2 | 80% | 70% | 2.71 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Cianorte | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 14:12 | 22 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 3.1 | 5.7 | 58% | 13% | 1.86 |
2. | Brasil de Pelotas | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 17:14 | 21 |
|
1.63 | 43% | 2.1 | 4.6 | 38% | 0% | 2.21 |
3. | Avenida | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14:19 | 19 |
|
1.38 | 57% | 2.8 | 3.7 | 88% | 46% | 2.36 |
4. | Novo Hamburgo | 14 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 14:15 | 18 |
|
1.00 | 71% | 1.7 | 5.9 | 58% | 29% | 2.07 |
5. | Hercílio Luz | 14 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 11:10 | 18 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 2.8 | 6.1 | 60% | 30% | 1.50 |
6. | Concórdia Atlético Clube | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 13:12 | 17 |
|
0.75 | 50% | 2.5 | 4.1 | 60% | 20% | 1.79 |
7. | Barra FC | 14 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 15:12 | 16 |
|
1.25 | 43% | 2.7 | 4.1 | 60% | 20% | 1.93 |
8. | Cascavel | 14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8:12 | 15 |
|
1.25 | 21% | 2.4 | 6.1 | 30% | 30% | 1.43 |