Previa del partido
MATCH REPORT
EE.UU. - USL League Two - 07/23/23 18:00
0-2 [90‘]
0-2 [90‘]
21‘ |
0-1
Unknown
|
|
45‘+2 |
0-2
Unknown
|
|
0-2 HT | ||
0-2 FT |
Estadísticas del partido
TARJETAS 0 0
TARJETAS 0 0
CUOTAS
Hándicap asiático | |||
---|---|---|---|
Línea | 1 | 2 | Línea |
+0.25 | 102 | -143 | -0.25 |
+0.75 | -167 | 116 | -0.75 |
+0 | 149 | -192 | -0 |
Alineaciones
Chicago City
-
Chicago City tiene buena forma en los últimos 5 partidos
El entrenador P. Thomas puede estar satisfecho con la forma de su equipo (4V, 0E, 1D) en los últimos 5 partidos.
-
Buena forma en los últimos 5 partidos en casa para Chicago City
En los últimos 5 partidos en el registro de forma es (5V, 0E, 0D) lo cual es una recompensa para los Chicago City fanáticos con una asistencia promedio de 0 en casa.
-
Racha invicta (7) en el estadio local
Chicago City está invicto en sus últimos 7 partidos en casa en USL League Two (7V, 0E). Los jugadores anotaron 24 goles y concedieron 6 en esa racha.
Michigan Bucks
Resumen
H2H
H2H (CASA/FUERA)
FORMA
FORMA (CASA/FUERA)
Fuerza del equipo
Enfrentamientos directos
DES |
Tiros |
Tiros (a puerta) |
Ataque peligroso |
Saques de esquina |
Alineación Cambios |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Forma del equipo
Chicago City Last 6 Matches
DES |
Tiros |
Tiros (a puerta) |
Ataque peligroso |
Saques de esquina |
Alineación Cambios |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21.7 |
Chicago City
|
5 - 1 |
Cleveland Force
|
1-0 | 21 - 10 | 14 - 3 | 122 - 102 | 5 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-250 | 400 | 450 | |
15.7 |
Wichita
|
2 - 1 |
Chicago City
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
13.7 |
Chicago City
|
3 - 0 |
Chicago Dutch Lions
|
2-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-2000 | 900 | 1800 | |
6.7 |
Chicago City
|
2 - 0 |
Wichita
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-455 | 550 | 700 | |
1.7 |
Des Moines Menace
|
1 - 2 |
Chicago City
|
0-0 | 13 - 8 | 6 - 5 | 47 - 37 | 5 - 5 |
0 (1%) 0 (0%) |
-143 | 333 | 225 | |
24.6 |
St. Charles
|
1 - 5 |
Chicago City
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Michigan Bucks Last 6 Matches
DES |
Tiros |
Tiros (a puerta) |
Ataque peligroso |
Saques de esquina |
Alineación Cambios |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21.7 |
Fort Wayne
|
2 - 2 |
Michigan Bucks
|
1-2 | 13 - 9 | 5 - 4 | 90 - 135 | 5 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
125 | 260 | 150 | |
15.7 |
Michigan Bucks
|
3 - 2 |
Kalamazoo FC
|
3-1 | 8 - 6 | 6 - 2 | 45 - 55 | 7 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-250 | 375 | 500 | |
12.7 |
Lansing City
|
1 - 0 |
Michigan Bucks
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
8.7 |
Michigan Bucks
|
1 - 0 |
AFC Ann Arbor
|
1-0 | 1 - 1 | 1 - 1 | 57 - 58 | 5 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-227 | 333 | 425 | |
1.7 |
Michigan Bucks
|
7 - 0 |
South Bend Lions
|
4-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
24.6 |
Michigan Bucks
|
3 - 2 |
Oakland County
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Clasificaciones
Central Conference | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deep North Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Thunder Bay Chill | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 29:9 | 29 |
|
2.75 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.9 | 92% | 58% | 3.17 |
2. | RKC | 12 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 35:20 | 25 |
|
1.63 | 75% | 0.5 | 1.5 | 100% | 83% | 4.58 |
3. | St. Croix | 12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16:22 | 16 |
|
1.25 | 58% | 1.2 | 3.0 | 92% | 75% | 3.17 |
4. | WSA Winnipeg | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 21:14 | 18 |
|
1.38 | 82% | 0.5 | 1.5 | 90% | 63% | 3.18 |
5. | Rochester | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 15:25 | 14 |
|
0.88 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 83% | 67% | 3.33 |
6. | Minneapolis City | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 15:25 | 9 |
|
1.00 | 91% | 0.6 | 1.0 | 82% | 65% | 3.64 |
7. | Milwaukee Bavarians | 12 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 14:30 | 5 |
|
0.63 | 75% | 1.4 | 2.2 | 90% | 60% | 3.67 |
Great Lakes Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Michigan Bucks | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 29:9 | 31 |
|
2.38 | 42% | 1.2 | 2.3 | 67% | 50% | 3.17 |
2. | AFC Ann Arbor | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 23:13 | 19 |
|
1.63 | 55% | 1.0 | 3.3 | 80% | 63% | 3.27 |
3. | Oakland County | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 20:22 | 16 |
|
1.63 | 67% | 1.0 | 1.9 | 83% | 67% | 3.50 |
4. | Lansing City | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 15:20 | 16 |
|
1.50 | 58% | 0.8 | 0.8 | 90% | 60% | 2.92 |
5. | Midwest United | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 20:17 | 12 |
|
0.63 | 64% | 0.5 | 0.7 | 72% | 63% | 3.36 |
6. | Kalamazoo FC | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 25:29 | 15 |
|
1.75 | 83% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 100% | 75% | 4.50 |
7. | South Bend Lions | 12 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8:30 | 4 |
|
0.25 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.6 | 90% | 58% | 3.17 |
Heartland Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Chicago City | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 36:9 | 33 |
|
2.63 | 58% | 1.1 | 2.5 | 100% | 73% | 3.75 |
2. | Des Moines Menace | 12 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 42:11 | 30 |
|
2.25 | 42% | 0.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 92% | 4.42 |
3. | Peoria | 12 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 27:17 | 18 |
|
1.50 | 58% | 0.8 | 1.6 | 100% | 67% | 3.67 |
4. | St. Charles | 12 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 23:31 | 18 |
|
1.13 | 67% | 0.4 | 2.4 | 92% | 83% | 4.50 |
5. | Wichita | 12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 22:28 | 12 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 0.4 | 0.9 | 92% | 75% | 4.17 |
6. | Chicago Dutch Lions | 12 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 12:35 | 9 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 0.6 | 1.7 | 90% | 72% | 3.92 |
7. | Springfield ASC | 12 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 9:40 | 6 |
|
0.38 | 42% | 0.2 | 0.4 | 65% | 65% | 4.08 |
Valley Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Fort Wayne | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 31:3 | 32 |
|
2.75 | 17% | 0.1 | 1.2 | 83% | 58% | 2.83 |
2. | Cleveland Force | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 27:18 | 19 |
|
1.75 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 92% | 83% | 3.75 |
3. | Toledo Villa | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 21:19 | 19 |
|
1.50 | 75% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
4. | Kings Hammer | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 11:15 | 10 |
|
0.88 | 70% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.60 |
5. | Dayton Dutch Lions | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9:23 | 6 |
|
0.75 | 45% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.91 |
6. | Buffalo | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11:32 | 6 |
|
0.50 | 55% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.91 |