Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
Deutschland - State Leagues: Hessen - Mitte - 10/06/24 09:30 - 12.Runde
0-0 [45‘]
0-0 [45‘]
0-6 FT |
Spielstatistiken
KARTEN 0 0
KARTEN 0 0
QUOTEN
Aufstellungen
Burgsolms
-
Schlechte Ergebnisse in den letzten Spielen für Burgsolms
Schlechte Form in den letzten 5 Spielen. Keine leichte Zeit für die Spieler und Trainer , da die Formbilanz (1S, 2U, 2N) mit ihrem Durchschnitt von 2.4 Gegentoren pro Spiel ist.
Rot-Weiß Hadamar
-
Schlechte Form in Auswärtsspielen
2 Niederlagen in 5 Spielen. (0S, 3U, 2N) ist die Bilanz in Auswärtsspielen. Mit ihrem Durchschnitt von 1.2 Gegentoren pro Spiel.
Zusammenfassung
H2H
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
FORM
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
Teamstärke
Kopf-an-Kopf
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/18/24 |
Burgsolms
|
1-0 |
Rot-Weiß Hadamar
|
0 - 0 | 0- 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
10/29/23 |
Rot-Weiß Hadamar
|
1-3 |
Burgsolms
|
0 - 0 | 0- 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Teamform
Burgsolms Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.10 |
Burgsolms
|
0 - 0 |
Ederbergland
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
28.9 |
Dietkirchen
|
4 - 1 |
Burgsolms
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
15.9 |
SV Zeilsheim
|
8 - 2 |
Burgsolms
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
7.9 |
Burgsolms
|
3 - 0 |
Niedernhausen
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
1.9 |
Kinzenbach
|
0 - 0 |
Burgsolms
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
25.8 |
Burgsolms
|
0 - 0 |
Cleeberg
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Rot-Weiß Hadamar Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.10 |
SV Zeilsheim
|
0 - 0 |
Rot-Weiß Hadamar
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
29.9 |
Rot-Weiß Hadamar
|
3 - 0 |
SF BG Marburg
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
21.9 |
Ederbergland
|
4 - 1 |
Rot-Weiß Hadamar
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
15.9 |
Rot-Weiß Hadamar
|
8 - 1 |
Waldgirmes II
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
8.9 |
TuBa Pohlheim
|
2 - 1 |
Rot-Weiß Hadamar
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
29.8 |
Rot-Weiß Hadamar
|
0 - 0 |
SV Wiesbaden
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Tabellen
Hessen - Mitte | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | SV Zeilsheim | 16 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 20:7 | 21 |
|
1.38 | 25% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.69 |
2. | SG Walluf | 15 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 31:9 | 28 |
|
2.25 | 47% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
3. | Biebrich | 15 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 24:8 | 26 |
|
2.13 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.13 |
4. | Germania Okriftel | 15 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 20:15 | 22 |
|
1.75 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
5. | FC Waldbrunn | 16 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 21:11 | 27 |
|
1.88 | 44% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
6. | Ederbergland | 16 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 14:9 | 21 |
|
1.13 | 25% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.44 |
7. | Rot-Weiß Hadamar | 15 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 26:12 | 22 |
|
1.75 | 27% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.53 |
8. | SF BG Marburg | 16 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7:17 | 14 |
|
0.88 | 25% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
9. | TuBa Pohlheim | 15 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 18:12 | 23 |
|
1.50 | 27% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
10. | SV Wiesbaden | 15 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 23:20 | 18 |
|
1.63 | 47% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.87 |
11. | Dietkirchen | 16 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 16:7 | 24 |
|
2.13 | 13% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.44 |
12. | 09 Breidenbach | 15 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 17:19 | 22 |
|
1.63 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.40 |
13. | Cleeberg | 15 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 9:22 | 13 |
|
0.75 | 20% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.07 |
14. | Burgsolms | 16 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 7:24 | 12 |
|
0.38 | 19% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.94 |
15. | Waldgirmes II | 16 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 11:31 | 11 |
|
0.38 | 44% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.63 |
16. | Kinzenbach | 15 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 10:21 | 11 |
|
0.63 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.07 |
17. | Niedernhausen | 15 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0:30 | 5 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |