Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
USA - USL League Two - 06/01/24 18:00
0-2 [90‘]
0-2 [90‘]
0-1 HT | ||
0-2 FT |
Spielstatistiken
KARTEN 0 0
KARTEN 0 0
QUOTEN
Asiatisches Handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Linie | 1 | 2 | Linie |
+1.5 | -127 | -106 | -1.5 |
+1.25 | -105 | -139 | -1.25 |
+1.75 | -167 | 114 | -1.75 |
Aufstellungen
Union Macomb
-
Schlechte Ergebnisse in den letzten Spielen für Union Macomb
Schlechte Form in den letzten 5 Spielen. Keine leichte Zeit für die Spieler und Trainer , da die Formbilanz (0S, 0U, 5N) mit ihrem Durchschnitt von 2.4 Gegentoren pro Spiel ist.
-
Sieglos-Serie (5) Spiele
Union Macomb hat 5 Spiele in Folge nicht gewonnen.
-
5 Spiele in Folge verloren. Zeit für taktische Änderungen?
Schlechte Phase für Union Macomb. Trainer kann mit 5 Spielen in Folge Niederlagen nicht zufrieden sein. Es ist sehr wahrscheinlich, dass der Trainer taktische Änderungen vornehmen wird.
Midwest United
-
Midwest United hat gute Form in den letzten 5 Spielen
Trainer kann mit der Form seines Teams (4S, 1U, 0N) aus den letzten 5 Spielen zufrieden sein.
-
Ungeschlagene Serie (6) für Midwest United
Midwest United ist in den letzten 6 USL League Two Spielen ungeschlagen (5S, 1U). Die Spieler erzielten 11 Tore und kassierten 4 in dieser Serie.
Zusammenfassung
H2H
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
FORM
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
Teamstärke
Kopf-an-Kopf
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/08/24 |
Midwest United
|
3-2 |
Union Macomb
|
2-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Teamform
Union Macomb Last 5 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28.5 |
Lansing City
|
3 - 2 |
Union Macomb
|
1-0 | 4 - 4 | 3 - 0 | 37 - 44 | 9 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-167 | 260 | 375 | |
22.5 |
Michigan Bucks
|
1 - 0 |
Union Macomb
|
0-0 | 9 - 1 | 3 - 1 | 101 - 13 | 17 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-345 | 425 | 650 | |
18.5 |
Oakland County
|
1 - 0 |
Union Macomb
|
0-0 | 2 - 1 | 4 - 0 | 54 - 38 | 7 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-333 | 400 | 600 | |
11.5 |
AFC Ann Arbor
|
4 - 1 |
Union Macomb
|
2-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-175 | 300 | 333 | |
8.5 |
Midwest United
|
3 - 2 |
Union Macomb
|
2-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Midwest United Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29.5 |
Midwest United
|
2 - 1 |
Kalamazoo FC
|
2-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
22.5 |
Midwest United
|
2 - 1 |
Oakland County
|
0-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
18.5 |
Midwest United
|
3 - 0 |
AFC Ann Arbor
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
15.5 |
Midwest United
|
1 - 0 |
South Bend Lions
|
1-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
11.5 |
Lansing City
|
0 - 0 |
Midwest United
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
8.5 |
Midwest United
|
3 - 2 |
Union Macomb
|
2-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Tabellen
Central Conference | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deep North Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Thunder Bay Chill | 12 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 25:14 | 25 |
|
2.38 | 67% | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
2. | Milwaukee Bavarians | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 23:17 | 21 |
|
1.50 | 58% | 1.8 | 4.2 | 73% | 73% | 3.33 |
3. | RKC | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 21:16 | 19 |
|
1.63 | 42% | 1.2 | 3.9 | 100% | 75% | 3.08 |
4. | St. Croix | 12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 23:18 | 17 |
|
1.00 | 58% | 1.1 | 1.8 | 50% | 38% | 3.42 |
5. | Minneapolis City | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 11:18 | 15 |
|
1.50 | 25% | 0.7 | 3.6 | 50% | 38% | 2.42 |
6. | Rochester | 12 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 9:29 | 7 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 100% | 100% | 3.17 |
Great Lakes Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Michigan Bucks | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 39:16 | 33 |
|
2.38 | 64% | 0.4 | 2.9 | 50% | 50% | 3.93 |
2. | Midwest United | 14 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 28:13 | 31 |
|
1.88 | 36% | 0.1 | 1.1 | 70% | 50% | 2.93 |
3. | Kalamazoo FC | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 37:15 | 27 |
|
2.38 | 50% | 0.6 | 2.0 | 80% | 80% | 3.71 |
4. | AFC Ann Arbor | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 29:18 | 26 |
|
2.25 | 50% | 0.6 | 1.6 | 68% | 68% | 3.36 |
5. | Oakland County | 14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 16:26 | 14 |
|
1.00 | 43% | 0.5 | 3.4 | 58% | 46% | 3.00 |
6. | Lansing City | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 20:25 | 13 |
|
0.88 | 36% | 0.4 | 1.7 | 42% | 25% | 3.21 |
7. | Union Macomb | 14 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 21:28 | 13 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 0.9 | 2.4 | 75% | 63% | 3.50 |
8. | South Bend Lions | 14 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6:55 | 2 |
|
0.00 | 29% | 0.2 | 0.6 | 68% | 68% | 4.36 |
Heartland Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Des Moines Menace | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 37:10 | 29 |
|
2.75 | 58% | 0.9 | 0.8 | 88% | 50% | 3.92 |
2. | Peoria | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 35:13 | 27 |
|
2.13 | 58% | 0.8 | 2.3 | 100% | 83% | 4.00 |
3. | River Light | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 26:20 | 24 |
|
1.75 | 83% | 1.0 | 3.8 | 83% | 73% | 3.83 |
4. | St. Charles | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 37:20 | 21 |
|
1.63 | 83% | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 4.75 |
5. | Sueno | 11 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 20:32 | 9 |
|
0.75 | 73% | 0.5 | 1.6 | 100% | 100% | 4.73 |
6. | Chicago City | 11 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 14:28 | 7 |
|
0.50 | 64% | 1.4 | 4.1 | 90% | 80% | 3.82 |
7. | Chicago Dutch Lions | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 5:51 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 42% | 1.2 | 1.3 | 100% | 90% | 4.67 |
Valley Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Fort Wayne | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 20:10 | 26 |
|
1.75 | 58% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 58% | 58% | 2.50 |
2. | Cleveland Force | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 22:19 | 20 |
|
1.25 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.42 |
3. | Toledo Villa | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 18:14 | 19 |
|
1.63 | 58% | 0.5 | 1.8 | 25% | 25% | 2.67 |
4. | Buffalo | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 36:23 | 18 |
|
1.75 | 75% | 0.7 | 1.9 | 88% | 88% | 4.92 |
5. | Kings Hammer | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 14:19 | 10 |
|
0.75 | 58% | 0.3 | 0.4 | 63% | 25% | 2.75 |
6. | Dayton Dutch Lions | 12 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 5:30 | 6 |
|
0.75 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.92 |