Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
Brasilien - Serie D - 06/18/22 14:00 - 10.Runde
1-0 [96+6‘]
1-0 [96+6‘]
8‘ |
Dias
|
|
Uelber
|
37‘ | |
0-0 HT | ||
Tenner
Costa
|
46‘ | |
Fabinho
[1-0]
|
47‘ | |
54‘ |
Holstein
Dener
|
|
54‘ |
Peu
Carlos Barros Lopes
|
|
54‘ |
André
Packer
|
|
Ramos
Wallace
|
58‘ | |
64‘ |
Vitor
Ferrugem
|
|
Fabinho
Artur Machado Libânia
|
65‘ | |
Unknown
|
70‘ | |
Artur Machado Libânia
da Costa Matos
|
75‘ | |
Cal
Duda
|
75‘ | |
Wallace
|
80‘ | |
Hudson
|
81‘ | |
84‘ |
Holstein
|
|
90‘+1 |
Rigo
|
|
90‘+3 |
Rocha
Müller
|
|
1-0 FT |
Spielstatistiken
KARTEN 3 0
KARTEN 4 0
QUOTEN
Spiel | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Eröffnungsquoten | 188 | 180 | 145 | ||
Vor dem Spiel Quoten | 225 | 180 | 120 |
Asiatisches Handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Linie | 1 | 2 | Linie |
+0 | 105 | -130 | -0 |
Tore | ||
---|---|---|
Linie | Unter | Über |
2.5 | -278 | 210 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Linie | Unter | Über |
10 | -102 | -120 |
Aufstellungen
Juventus SC
-
Ungeschlagene Serie (3) im Heimstadion
Juventus SC ist in den letzten 3 Heimspielen in Serie D ungeschlagen (0S, 3U). Die Spieler erzielten 3 Tore und kassierten 3 in dieser Serie.
-
Schlechte Ergebnisse in den letzten Spielen für Juventus SC
Schlechte Form in den letzten 5 Spielen. Keine leichte Zeit für die Spieler und Trainer Dema, da die Formbilanz (0S, 2U, 3N) mit ihrem Durchschnitt von 1.2 Gegentoren pro Spiel ist.
-
Sieglos-Serie (9) Spiele
Juventus SC hat 9 Spiele in Folge nicht gewonnen.
-
Die Form im Heimstadion ist nicht gut
1 Niederlagen in 5 Spielen. (0S, 4U, 1N) ist die Bilanz auf dem heimischen Platz Estádio João Marcatto. Mit ihrem Durchschnitt von 1 Gegentoren pro Spiel.
-
Sieglos-Serie (5) Spiele zu Hause
Juventus SC hat 5 Spiele in Folge im Heimstadion nicht gewonnen.
Marcílio Dias
-
Schlechte Form in Auswärtsspielen
4 Niederlagen in 5 Spielen. (1S, 0U, 4N) ist die Bilanz in Auswärtsspielen. Mit ihrem Durchschnitt von 1.6 Gegentoren pro Spiel.
Zusammenfassung
H2H
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
FORM
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
Teamstärke
Kopf-an-Kopf
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/14/22 |
Marcílio Dias
|
2-1 |
Juventus SC
|
1-1 | 17 - 6 | 5- 1 | 81 - 79 | 5 - 4 |
2 (46%) 3 (33%) |
-120 | 188 | 350 | |
01/27/22 |
Juventus SC
|
2-2 |
Marcílio Dias
|
1-2 | 17 - 11 | 9- 5 | 40 - 38 | 2 - 7 |
0 (10%) 0 (10%) |
130 | 188 | 200 | |
10/03/21 |
Marcílio Dias
|
1-1 |
Juventus SC
|
0-1 | 15 - 15 | 7- 6 | 54 - 37 | 4 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-105 | 200 | 275 | |
08/07/21 |
Marcílio Dias
|
1-1 |
Juventus SC
|
1-1 | 10 - 7 | 6- 1 | 75 - 43 | 7 - 3 |
2 (45%) 0 (56%) |
105 | 160 | 350 | |
07/04/21 |
Juventus SC
|
2-0 |
Marcílio Dias
|
1-0 | 11 - 10 | 3- 3 | 63 - 72 | 5 - 8 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
138 | 200 | 188 | |
04/28/21 |
Juventus SC
|
0-1 |
Marcílio Dias
|
0-0 | 9 - 4 | 4- 2 | 51 - 33 | 10 - 5 |
1 (64%) 3 (61%) |
130 | 220 | 190 |
Teamform
Juventus SC Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.6 |
Cascavel
|
1 - 0 |
Juventus SC
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
3 (58%) 3 (32%) |
- | - | - | |
4.6 |
Juventus SC
|
0 - 0 |
Aimoré
|
0-0 | 4 - 0 | 1 - 0 | 44 - 33 | 7 - 1 |
4 (44%) 0 (57%) |
210 | 170 | 138 | |
28.5 |
Aimoré
|
2 - 0 |
Juventus SC
|
2-0 | 2 - 0 | 1 - 0 | 9 - 1 | 0 - 0 |
2 (51%) 0 (39%) |
-200 | 240 | 550 | |
21.5 |
Juventus SC
|
1 - 1 |
Cascavel
|
1-1 | 11 - 14 | 5 - 4 | 80 - 73 | 3 - 3 |
5 (36%) 0 (50%) |
260 | 188 | 105 | |
14.5 |
Marcílio Dias
|
2 - 1 |
Juventus SC
|
1-1 | 17 - 6 | 5 - 1 | 81 - 79 | 5 - 4 |
2 (46%) 3 (33%) |
-120 | 188 | 350 | |
7.5 |
Juventus SC
|
2 - 2 |
Azuriz
|
0-1 | 32 - 9 | 7 - 5 | 118 - 58 | 8 - 1 |
3 (37%) 8 (46%) |
130 | 188 | 200 |
Marcílio Dias Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.6 |
Marcílio Dias
|
2 - 1 |
Caxias
|
0-1 | 13 - 10 | 3 - 3 | 30 - 31 | 6 - 5 |
0 (40%) 2 (58%) |
160 | 220 | 140 | |
5.6 |
São Luiz
|
1 - 0 |
Marcílio Dias
|
0-0 | 5 - 9 | 1 - 1 | 43 - 47 | 4 - 8 |
3 (55%) 0 (55%) |
125 | 175 | 225 | |
28.5 |
Marcílio Dias
|
1 - 1 |
São Luiz
|
0-0 | 7 - 3 | 4 - 2 | 62 - 40 | 6 - 7 |
1 (49%) 1 (56%) |
-110 | 210 | 280 | |
21.5 |
Caxias
|
3 - 1 |
Marcílio Dias
|
0-0 | 13 - 12 | 8 - 7 | 45 - 40 | 5 - 7 |
2 (51%) 2 (48%) |
-133 | 225 | 333 | |
14.5 |
Marcílio Dias
|
2 - 1 |
Juventus SC
|
1-1 | 17 - 6 | 5 - 1 | 81 - 79 | 5 - 4 |
2 (46%) 3 (33%) |
-120 | 188 | 350 | |
8.5 |
Prospera Criciuma
|
0 - 1 |
Marcílio Dias
|
0-0 | 2 - 4 | 0 - 1 | 25 - 41 | 3 - 4 |
2 (38%) 0 (45%) |
220 | 240 | 100 |
Tabellen
1st Phase | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Amazonas | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 37:12 | 31 |
|
2.13 | 64% | 2.1 | 4.9 | 93% | 71% | 3.50 |
2. | Rio Branco | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 24:11 | 27 |
|
2.00 | 36% | 1.6 | 3.4 | 57% | 50% | 2.50 |
3. | São Raimundo AM | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 19:11 | 24 |
|
1.75 | 57% | 1.2 | 3.9 | 100% | 100% | 2.14 |
4. | São Raimundo RR | 14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 21:14 | 23 |
|
1.88 | 50% | 0.2 | 0.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.50 |
5. | Porto Velho | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 28:20 | 21 |
|
1.25 | 57% | 1.1 | 0.9 | 69% | 61% | 3.43 |
6. | Trem | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 29:27 | 16 |
|
1.38 | 71% | 1.1 | 2.3 | 86% | 79% | 4.00 |
7. | Humaitá | 14 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 11:32 | 6 |
|
0.25 | 50% | 1.1 | 1.3 | 71% | 57% | 3.07 |
8. | Náutico RR | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 15:57 | 5 |
|
0.38 | 64% | 0.5 | 0.4 | 100% | 85% | 5.14 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Moto Club MA | 14 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 24:14 | 28 |
|
2.00 | 36% | 2.5 | 4.5 | 93% | 50% | 2.71 |
2. | Tocantinópolis | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 23:21 | 22 |
|
1.63 | 64% | 2.4 | 3.6 | 79% | 64% | 3.14 |
3. | Pacajus | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 15:13 | 20 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 0.6 | 0.7 | 50% | 0% | 2.00 |
4. | Juventude MA | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14:14 | 20 |
|
1.88 | 50% | 0.6 | 0.4 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
5. | Fluminense PI | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 23:19 | 17 |
|
1.00 | 71% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 79% | 71% | 3.00 |
6. | Castanhal | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 16:15 | 17 |
|
1.00 | 36% | 1.8 | 5.8 | 64% | 50% | 2.21 |
7. | 4 de Julho | 14 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 13:19 | 13 |
|
0.88 | 50% | 1.3 | 4.5 | 71% | 64% | 2.29 |
8. | Tuna Luso | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 12:25 | 13 |
|
1.38 | 36% | 2.4 | 4.2 | 79% | 50% | 2.64 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Retrô | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 27:6 | 33 |
|
2.38 | 50% | 0.6 | 0.4 | 50% | 50% | 2.36 |
2. | América RN | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 20:7 | 24 |
|
1.88 | 36% | 2.4 | 5.6 | 50% | 29% | 1.93 |
3. | Sousa | 14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 18:17 | 23 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.9 | 50% | 50% | 2.50 |
4. | Afogados | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 23:12 | 22 |
|
1.75 | 50% | 1.1 | 0.7 | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
5. | Icasa | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 16:18 | 22 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 1.0 | 2.4 | 64% | 43% | 2.43 |
6. | São Paulo Crystal | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 13:26 | 13 |
|
0.38 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.0 | 71% | 43% | 2.79 |
7. | Globo | 14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 14:17 | 12 |
|
1.38 | 50% | 1.7 | 3.4 | 71% | 43% | 2.21 |
8. | Crato | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 5:33 | 5 |
|
0.13 | 29% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 79% | 36% | 2.71 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Lagarto | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 23:12 | 25 |
|
1.88 | 57% | 2.9 | 5.9 | 71% | 43% | 2.50 |
2. | ASA | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 15:12 | 25 |
|
1.88 | 29% | 2.3 | 3.5 | 57% | 29% | 1.93 |
3. | Jacuipense | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 19:15 | 21 |
|
1.50 | 57% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.43 |
4. | Santa Cruz | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14:15 | 19 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 2.0 | 6.3 | 64% | 29% | 2.07 |
5. | Sergipe | 14 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 14:12 | 18 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 2.2 | 4.4 | 64% | 29% | 1.86 |
6. | Juazeirense | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8:13 | 16 |
|
1.00 | 29% | 2.9 | 5.4 | 50% | 7% | 1.50 |
7. | CSE | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 19:22 | 14 |
|
0.88 | 71% | 3.0 | 6.8 | 71% | 64% | 2.93 |
8. | Atlético Alagoinhas | 14 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 13:24 | 10 |
|
0.63 | 64% | 2.2 | 4.1 | 79% | 50% | 2.64 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Brasiliense | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 22:10 | 33 |
|
2.13 | 50% | 0.4 | 1.1 | 100% | 50% | 2.29 |
2. | Anápolis | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 17:11 | 25 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.2 | 1.2 | 100% | 100% | 2.00 |
3. | Costa Rica - MS | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 14:13 | 21 |
|
1.38 | 50% | 0.2 | 0.5 | 50% | 50% | 1.93 |
4. | Operário Ltda | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 10:12 | 21 |
|
1.75 | 29% | 0.2 | 0.6 | 50% | 0% | 1.57 |
5. | Ceilândia | 14 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 15:12 | 20 |
|
1.13 | 36% | 1.7 | 4.6 | 57% | 50% | 1.93 |
6. | Iporá | 14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 12:12 | 15 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 0.7 | 2.4 | 50% | 36% | 1.71 |
7. | Grêmio Anápolis | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 12:14 | 14 |
|
1.00 | 43% | 1.5 | 3.1 | 50% | 36% | 1.86 |
8. | Acao Cuiaba | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 12:30 | 5 |
|
0.63 | 64% | 2.5 | 2.6 | 93% | 64% | 3.00 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Pouso Alegre | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 12:9 | 26 |
|
1.63 | 29% | 2.4 | 4.9 | 50% | 21% | 1.50 |
2. | Bahia de Feira | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 17:8 | 24 |
|
2.25 | 29% | 1.7 | 3.2 | 50% | 14% | 1.79 |
3. | Real Noroeste | 14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 19:13 | 23 |
|
1.38 | 57% | 2.2 | 2.6 | 64% | 57% | 2.29 |
4. | Nova Venécia | 14 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 19:13 | 22 |
|
1.38 | 71% | 1.4 | 3.6 | 79% | 50% | 2.29 |
5. | Inter de Limeira | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 16:16 | 17 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 2.9 | 4.7 | 57% | 50% | 2.29 |
6. | Ferroviária | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 15:14 | 16 |
|
1.38 | 29% | 1.9 | 5.7 | 57% | 36% | 2.07 |
7. | URT | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 13:26 | 16 |
|
1.13 | 36% | 1.4 | 2.1 | 64% | 36% | 2.79 |
8. | Caldense | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8:20 | 5 |
|
0.38 | 43% | 2.0 | 4.8 | 50% | 36% | 2.00 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | São Bernardo | 14 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 13:3 | 27 |
|
1.88 | 7% | 2.1 | 6.3 | 29% | 14% | 1.14 |
2. | Paraná | 14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 13:8 | 23 |
|
1.38 | 36% | 1.8 | 3.9 | 50% | 14% | 1.50 |
3. | Portuguesa RJ | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 13:10 | 21 |
|
2.13 | 43% | 3.1 | 4.7 | 64% | 14% | 1.64 |
4. | Oeste | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14:15 | 20 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 100% | 0% | 2.07 |
5. | Nova Iguaçu | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 13:14 | 20 |
|
1.38 | 57% | 3.1 | 5.8 | 64% | 29% | 1.93 |
6. | Santo André | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 12:13 | 15 |
|
1.00 | 36% | 2.2 | 4.8 | 57% | 21% | 1.79 |
7. | Cianorte | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 14:15 | 14 |
|
1.13 | 57% | 2.6 | 3.1 | 64% | 36% | 2.07 |
8. | Perolas Negras | 14 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 9:23 | 8 |
|
0.50 | 43% | 2.4 | 3.6 | 71% | 43% | 2.29 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Caxias | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 20:12 | 27 |
|
2.13 | 50% | 2.9 | 6.1 | 64% | 43% | 2.29 |
2. | Aimoré | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 17:14 | 27 |
|
2.25 | 36% | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0% | 0% | 2.21 |
3. | Cascavel | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 16:10 | 25 |
|
1.38 | 36% | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0% | 0% | 1.86 |
4. | Azuriz | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 17:12 | 24 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 0.4 | 0.4 | 100% | 0% | 2.07 |
5. | São Luiz | 14 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 18:17 | 18 |
|
1.25 | 71% | 2.8 | 4.9 | 79% | 50% | 2.50 |
6. | Marcílio Dias | 14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 14:20 | 14 |
|
0.88 | 50% | 2.3 | 5.4 | 64% | 43% | 2.43 |
7. | Juventus SC | 14 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 11:17 | 12 |
|
1.13 | 43% | 2.4 | 3.4 | 64% | 29% | 2.00 |
8. | Prospera Criciuma | 14 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 9:20 | 6 |
|
0.25 | 43% | 2.1 | 3.0 | 50% | 36% | 2.07 |